Monday, December 23, 2013

Criminal Law

8 Mistake, intoxication, self- defense force Mistake Introduction English in force(p) divides mistake in illegal law of nature into ii parts: mistake of law and mistake of fact. The common monster is that if the incriminate makes a mistake of law, he is guilty, whereas if he makes a mistake of fact, he is not. Unfortunately the law is more complex than these propositions touch onlyow. A preliminary point is that if an accuse because of a disease of the mind makes a mistake of law, he may have a defence of insanity. This defence is discussed in the close chapter. Mistake and ignorance of law In Esop (1836) 173 ER 203 the accused was convicted of an offensive under English law, buggery; under his face-to-face law no such offence existed. Accordingly, where the accused has the applicable actus reus and mens rea for the crime, he is guilty even though he did not fill in that the actus reus was forbidden by the criminal law. He was mistaken as to the restrains of En glish law. Moreover, ignorance of the law is no defence: Bailey (1800) 168 ER 657. The accused was convicted of a crime which Parliament had created musical composition he was on the high seas, and there was no focal point of ?nding out that a law had been enacted. The case has been taken to see to it that impossibility is no defence. However, it may be that Bailey should be guide differently.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The case was referred to all the judges. They recommended a pardon. Since at that time a pardon was the sole way of reversing the ?rst instance decision, it may be that they disagreed with the proposition that ignorance of t he law was no defence. Bailey has neverthele! ss been treated as deciding that, and the rule has been accepted in, e.g., Carter v McLaren (1871) LR 2 Sc & D 120. The rule was deferd by the Court of Appeal in Lightfoot (1993) 97 Cr App R 24: . . . Knowledge of the law . . . is contradictory . . . The fact that a man does not go to sleep what is criminal and what is not . . . cannot save him from conviction if what he does, mate with the state of his mind, satis?es all the elements...If you want to get a total essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.