Euthanasia and Whether it is Morally Justified and Hence Ethically Essay

Euthanasia and Whether it is Morally Justified and Hence Ethically Acceptable - Essay ExampleThere is need for the stand for of assisted suicide to be morally justifiable to make it ethical. However, the major question is to whom the act is meant to justify morality to. Every case that requires euthanasia should be considered dissentently with its own tenets. The use of euthanasia is morally justifiable and is thitherfore ethically acceptable since the use requires the opinion of medical practitioners. If their expert opinion is considered after(prenominal) the condition of the individual is thoroughly analyzed to make sure that all actions to alleviate their pain has been taken and no other options are available, because it is important for euthanasia to be applied for the good of the individual as well as that of the pack closest to him/her. Many people may argue that there is a higher power that guides human life and that only that power and that power alone is responsible fo r giving and ending human life. I differ with this position vehemently and I strongly believe in the power of the human existence to derive his/her own destiny. The advances in technology have given up people the power to claim expertise in a certain profession. This is no different for the medical practice. This means that they opinion of these experts should be regarded in sort out of the advances in technology. ... The theory further suggests that in order for an end to be arrived at, a principle or maxim which is supreme and devoid of human turn is followed. This is the sole scale on which the moral worth of any action is weighed. The theory believes that all human beings were created supreme and as such have it in them an inherent capability to decide what is either good or bad. The father of this theory, Immanuel Kant, strongly believed that a categorical imperative is what is responsible for the actions that human beings choose to follow. The fact that the maxims contain ed in this theory are universal and as thus are right. The simplicity of this theory is that if for example a maxim stated that killing people who you dislike holds true, then the human race would non exist as ultimately, we will be forced to end the lives of all who we dislike and consequently, those who do not like us will kills us. On that example alone, the Kantian theory tends to suggest that it is impossible for a maxim to be untrue or molest as it is not ultimately decided by the human being himself but rather on a power that is beyond the human being himself. The theory however only holds true where the human being applying the maxim believes in it and follows it to the latter. The Kantian theory is flawed in some aspects. First, when a mortal conceives the maxim to hold true but it is no longer a means to an end, then the result may not be what is desired by the theory. The above consequence of the Kantian theory is interpreted as a perfect duty as the maxim has been uph eld. In the case of the use of euthanasia, then the end of human life may not follow the maxim since its following will not be the best option for the afflicted